[cw-discuss] Crossover - VST plugin support?
Jeremy White
jwhite at codeweavers.com
Tue Jan 16 14:53:11 CST 2007
Thanks for that explanation, that helps a great deal.
So would the ideal then be the ability to install a Windows VST
plugin in CrossOver, and have CrossOver drop a stub Mac OS X VST
plugin into the Mac OS X environment? In theory, then, a Mac OS X
(Intel only) VST host could run a Windows VST plugin.
(That's much what we do for Netscape style plugins on Linux).
Cheers,
Jeremy
JJB wrote:
> On OS X the OS has a plugin standard called Audio Units. But before
> there was OS X, there was VST, a semi-cross platform standard which has
> been updated for OS X. Almost all plugin manufacturers who write
> plugins for the Mac release in both VST and AU formats. The VST
> standard on the pc is not binary compatiblle with OS X VST, so plugins
> made to run in Windows will not run under OS X. For some reason, the
> number of plugins for Windows created over the years is astronmonical,
> and the number for mac is not.
>
> On the mac, there is a program from FXpansion that wrapps VST plugins
> with code so they work in Audio Units compatible hosts. There is
> nothing that works in the other direction, wrapping Audio Units to
> look like VST's. Nor any way of accessing the plethora of Windows VST
> plugins on OS X (Intel).
>
> On LInux, using Wine, people have developed ways to run windows VST
> plugins. While there are difficulties getting them to work, when they
> do work, they work better than under Windows - lower latency, better
> performance. Meanwhile, a Linux plugin format is evolving, and someone
> has made a wrapper for that system to use VST plugins, which apparantly
> workes better than the original system.
>
> I was hoping that codeweavers might be able to recompile the existing
> code from either vstserver or its descendants to work under OS X.
>
> If this could work in a CPU efficient manner, with low latency audio
> output, I think the business case would be very good, given how many
> people use Macs for music. I'll think about this a bit more and try to
> get you some better data about what you might expect.
>
> Joel
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>
>> Hi Joel,
>>
>> Can you educate me a bit? Is there a standard on Mac OS X for
>> these plugins? That is, could you make a single plugin wrapper
>> that glued from 'format X' to VST?
>>
>> One concern I have is that on Linux I didn't feel that the
>> standards are all that stable.
>>
>> We're actually quite good at writing this sort of plugin
>> server, and I'm interested in other areas where we could
>> provide this functionality.
>>
>> Before I get your hopes up, I should be brutally honest:
>> this is likely to be one of those where I'm intellectually
>> interested, but then am unable to make the business case
>> for the work required to make it go.
>>
>> However, we can certainly create an entry for VST plugin
>> support in our compatibility center and let folks rally there;
>> if we see clear and compelling demand for it in the form
>> of pledges, then the business case will be easy <grin>.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>>
>> JJB wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Crossover developers
>>>
>>> There has been several rather successful WINE based attempts to create
>>> systems for running windows VST audio plugins, the most popular audio
>>> plugin format, under Linux. Since your system is based on WINE, I was
>>> thinking the following:
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to build a very limited version of Crossover that
>>> does nothing but run VST plugins? For those of us who have switched to
>>> Mac and just want that functionality, it would be great if there was a
>>> simple install and host that could be used to run all those thousands
>>> and thousands of plugins, many of which are freeware, on OS X.
>>> Currently there are perhaps 15-20 freeware VST plugins for OS X, lots
>>> more commercial ones, but some of the PC vst plugins, even the free
>>> ones are really quite exceptional.
>>>
>>> The original, now abandoned project was called vstserver, the newer
>>> standard appears to be somewhat more complex, but apparently does a
>>> better job of running VST plugins: DSSI a standard for Linux audio
>>> plugins with a wrapper that allows pc VST plugins to run. Another
>>> project that appears to have success in the same area is FST-jack.
>>>
>>> If any of these could be made to run under OS X, it would be truly
>>> wonderful. Even better if it had a GUI on it...
>>>
>>> Here is the page to look at for overall info: http://
>>> ladspavst.linuxaudio.org/?intro=1
>>>
>>> Sourcecode for vstserver appears to be here: http://www.notam02.no/
>>> arkiv/src/
>>>
>>> Thanks, let me know if there is anything in the works like this,
>>>
>>> Joel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at crossover.codeweavers.com
>>> http://crossover.codeweavers.com/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the discuss
mailing list